The only one you can really say was on something was the one who scored 118-109. I had Alvarez winning 115-112 I gave Trout 5 rounds. You can argue 6 but Canelo would still have come out ahead because of the knock down. Trout was busier, but his shots did not land as cleanly and he certainly did not hurt Alvarez with his shots. Alvarez had higher connect percentages and bothered Trout with his power a few times. It was a great fight. I think the Trout is a classy guy and a very good fighter. Like he said, he wasn't expecting that Alvarez would have such movement.

I also had Alvarez winning 115-112.Trout used his jab well but never seemed to throw those punishing power shots.I think He thought he could steal rounds and when a guy is countering your every move you will lose.Alvarez to me boxed Beautifully.He seemed to pound trout into submission.

Being Honest I'm shocked you see it for Trout

Yeah I think Canelo won, but I think it was super close and the fact that Canelo knocked trout down is why he won.

Maybe that one judged just closed his eyes an judged by sound ha anyways I had it for Canelo with the knock down as being the difference

ahhaha i watch the fight in slowmo and trout did not won a single round...How the hell trout won the fight? hell no...He is not a good fighter man, canelo clearly a better fighter...

To get such a very one sided fight like that, they must have been on something pretty strong. I thought Trout won, but don't think the fight was taken from him, but man those scorecards..