2. Floyd vs. Canelo
3. Lara vs Williams
4. Floyd vs. Ortiz
5. Pacquiao v Bradley
6. Herrera vs Garcia
7. Wilder vs Scott
1. Lara Williams 2. Pac Bradley 3. Herrera Garcia 4. Wilder Scott angulo and canelo was not a robbery
Lara, and Pacquiao are my Top 2, because if I remember correctly I had them both winning 9+ rounds. No bias either I wasn't to sure of Lara at time, and was rooting for Bradley.
Wilder- Scott I immediately said was that fixed when he went down.My buddy said no he took a decent shot, so i'm 50/50 on it, but you did say it would be fishy, and it was. Malik could be a can crushing glassed jaw clown, or he's getting paid, this was shady, and the Chisora was shady too.
Angulo was getting beat up the whole fight, then a bad stoppage, but he was getting his head punched in.
1. Lara vs. Williams was a blatant robbery in my opinion. The boxing commission suspended the judges after the corrupt scoring.
2. Pacquiao vs. Bradley was a robbery. I had Pacquiao winning by 4 points on my scorecard.
3. Herrera vs. Garcia was a robbery but not as bad as the others. I thought Herrera won by at least 4 points.
4. Wilder vs. Scott seemed a bit fishy but Wilder have devasting power. He won every fight by knockout so who knows.
5. Canelo vs. Angulo wasn't fixed in my opinion. He won because Angulo is a one dimensional fighter with power.
Canelo and Angulo was not fixed for the billionth time. Herrera-Garcia, Pac-Bradley, and Lara-Williams weren't fixes either. It just means the judges were corrupt dummy. They showed favoritism for the bigger star. Except in Pac and Bradley CJ Ross is just a stupid b*tch. Herrera vs Garcia was in puerto rico so I saw a hometown decision coming right away. Why the hell don't you mention the Burns vs Beltran fight? That is an obvious sign of the judges being paid off. Herrera vs Garcia weren't paid off judges. Because if it was the only judge from puerto rico wouldn't have had herrera winning. The other 2 were just favoring garcis surely.
1. Canelo vs Angulo
2. Lara vs Williams
3. Pacquiao v Bradley
4. Herrera vs Garcia
5. Wilder vs Scott
My ranking is a s stated above, Wilder vs Scott is so low because it was so blatant, and such a Fischer-Price effort that it doesn't even deserve to be mentioned alongside real fixed fights lololol
WHAT A JOKE!!!
