4? 5?

The ones where ''Pacquiao won'' were clearly robberies, now Pactard got the KO.

Officially 1.

Unofficially I think none. Those were clear fights that could go either way. We can't call close fights robberies. I scored Pacquiao winning their first fight by 1 point, which is a very close fight to score.

As an objective scorer, I score their first fight for Pacquiao by 1 point, their second fight as a draw, while their third fight for Marquez by 1 point. But, that's still not a robbery and that fight could also go either way.

So, I think Marquez had beaten Pacquiao twice now, but officially once.

Officialy- 1

My personal opinion- 2/4. From my opinion, Marquez won 3 and 4(duh) while Pacquiao won the first two. The first one was a draw due to a judge's mistake and the second fight was close but like many, it was the knockdown the deciding factor. I think Marquez won 3 based on QUALITY punching, although the judges seem to have searched for quantity punching. No need to discuss fight 4.

We only look at records here, man. And on record, he only won once. The first 3 fights were damn close and could've gone either way, but the judges said Pac drew one and won 2 so you gotta move on.

Marquez whooped his *** EVERYTIME. Yet the judges were biased idiots and gave it to Pac. So marquez had to KO him to prove he's the better one.

marquez won only once but will lose again if theres a rematch

4? 5?

The ones where ''Pacquiao won'' were clearly robberies, now Pactard got the KO.