Which do you prefer/which is the more competitive fight?

Who do you have in either fight?

Hi STICK AND MOVE.

I agree with Sean G, I think that Adrien Broner against Marcos Maidana is a better fight.

Broner will box and fight on the outside with Maidana, like Amir Khan did but will be more impressive than Khan. Broner will take this fight by a unanimous decision.

The more competitive fight is Keith Thurman who is bigger and stronger than Broner, but the difference between him and Maidana is hand speed. Maidana's hand speed is definitely not great, while Thurman has decent speed.

This would be a highly competitive fight. Thurman being the aggressor. Some rounds Thurman will outfight Broner, some rounds Broner will outbox Thurman. He will trouble Broner, but I think Broner will take a split decision.

Hell, if both of these fights could be made, that would be great!

Adrien Broner vs Maidana would be a much more competitive fight than Thurman cuz imo Thurman would slaughter Broner.

Broner vs Maidana, Ima go with Broner, Maidana is too limited and a bit slow.

I prefer Maidana and it would be the more competitive fight, Thurmans too much. Im going out there on this one and saying Maidana, Broner isnt unhittable his defense and footwork isnt Mayweathers. Maidana will definitly take some shots but he will also give them and Broners never tasted power before. I can see Maidanas corner saying similar advice as Martinezs in Martinez vs Williams II.

I think Broner vs. Maidana is the better fight. Maidana has called out Broner on Twitter. It would be a good style fight of boxer vs puncher. Broner wins looking better than Khan did vs Maidana.

Thurman would use his power and size to his advantage. I think Broner/ Thurman is a toss up.

Which do you prefer/which is the more competitive fight?

Who do you have in either fight?