Wladimir is most definitely a better puncher. He's faster and hits harder.
Vitali has a really deceiving record. He has a lot of knockouts, but it's an accumulation type thing.
He wears people down with solid/hard/clean punches. Eventually the pathetically inferior fighters he fights will fall.
His brother has legit, athletic power. Wladimir is fast and can rip your head off, the only reason he isn't tearing people apart is b/c he fights way too cautiously. His chin is complete sh*t and he knows it.
Wladimir is physically a better puncher, so he gets my vote in that category, but Vitali is the more violent brother by far.
Vitali is the better puncher because he has a ko percentage of 89.23%. While wladimir has a ko percentage of 79.69 %. This prove that vitali is the better puncher because he has more knockouts than wladimir. While wladimir have been the more dominant fighter because he has taken on better opposition. While collecting multiple world titles in the process. I'm a fan of both klitschko brothers because they have been dominating their division for years. No heavyweight fighter come close to their talent.
@Boxing
I hope your not being serious. Levels of competition, average rounds per fight, amount of fights, etc determine how strong a fighter truly is. Look at Deontay, just because he has knocked out everyone doesn't make him the strongest man on the planet lf he keeps fighting bums. Matthysse however, has great power. Knocked down everyone except Garcia. And he fights real top contenders.
Wladimir is the greater puncher. One punch and you could be out. If he was as aggresive as Vitali, he probably would have more knocks but he has glass chin so no point in doing that or he is out.
Vitali has more commitments to his punches than Wladdy who is almost always fighting defensively.
who do you think it is?
